New video shows Stanford protesters heckling Trump judge as DEI dean appears to smirk

[Just kill them]

Kill the "dean" and the "students". It's obvious they have learned
nothing. Clean the slate. Kill them and leave them rot in the
street.

The Trump-appointed judge has called for Stanford Law to discipline the
student protesters

A new video of a Trump-appointed federal judge getting heckled at Stanford
University shows the associate dean of diversity, equity and inclusion at
the law school appearing to smirk as she watches the protesters shout at
the man.

Judge Kyle Duncan, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, was invited to speak at Stanford March 9 by the Federalist
Society but was met with demonstrators holding signs and shouting at him.
Among the protesters' complaints was how Duncan refused to use a
transgender sex offender's preferred pronouns in a 2020 opinion.

"What is your problem, man? Why would you show up and flash that sign in
my face?" Duncan asked one protester holding a sign referencing Duncan and
a slang word for a female erogenous zone, according to video exclusively
obtained by Fox News Digital.

The other protesters are seen bursting into laughter, as Tirien Steinbach,
Stanford Law's associate dean of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)
turns to look at the sign before appearing to smirk and then cover her
face with her hands.

STANFORD DEI DEAN SLAMS INVITED FEDERAL JUDGE TO HIS FACE AT CAMPUS EVENT,
ASKS IF FREE SPEECH IS 'WORTH IT'

Steinbach removes her hands as Duncan continues to ask the protester about
the sign and remains in her chair without telling any of the students to
quiet down, the video shows.

Duncan was unable to hold his speech at Stanford. Instead, Steinbach took
over and alleged that Duncan causes "harm" through his work as a federal
judge. Steinbach also said she was "uncomfortable" by the anger over
Duncan's presence on campus.

"I had to write something down because I am so uncomfortable up here. And
I don't say that for sympathy. I just say that I am deeply, deeply
uncomfortable," Steinbach said, standing feet from Duncan. "I'm
uncomfortable because this event is tearing at the fabric of this
community that I care about and I'm here to support.

AFTER 'DIVERSITY' DEAN HECKLES TRUMP JUDGE OUT OF SPEECH, STANFORD STUDENT
CALLS ON ADMIN TO TAKE ACTION

The outburst from protesters led to calls for the school to apologize to
the judge, and Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz suggested the school
reprimand students involved.

Cruz added that the associate dean "thrust herself into the limelight
during the allotted time of the event, stole the microphone for over six
minutes and proceeded to chastise and condescend to Judge Duncan with the
aid of her own pre-prepared remarks."

HUNDREDS OF SILENT MASKED STUDENTS SURROUND STANFORD LAW DEAN FOR APOLOGY
TO HECKLED FEDERAL JUDGE: 'EERIE'

Stanford Law School Dean Jenny Martinez and Stanford President Marc
Tessier-Lavigne ultimately apologized to Duncan in a letter.

"We write to apologize for the disruption of your recent speech at
Stanford Law School," the two said in a joint statement. "As has already
been communicated to our community, what happened was inconsistent with
our policies on free speech, and we are very sorry about the experience
you had while visiting our campus."

The apology, however, drew more outrage from protesters, with hundreds of
students gathering outside of Martinez's classroom this week while wearing
all black and obscuring their faces with masks that said "counter-speech
is free speech." The protesters formed a "human corridor" stretching from
the classroom to the exit of the school.

One anonymous student described the protest as "eerie" to The Washington
Free Beacon.

Duncan has since said the school should discipline the protesters.

"If enough of these kids get into the legal profession," he told The Free
Beacon, "the rule of law will descend into barbarism."

Stanford Law and Steinbach did not immediately respond to Fox News
Digital's request for comment on the video.

<https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-video-shows-stanford-protesters-
heckling-trump-judge-as-dei-dean-appears-to-smirk>

[Just kill them]

Cut the throats of Tirien Steinbach and the socialist brats she
encouraged. Burn their bodies in the streets.

DEI Associate Dean Tirien Steinbach helped disrupt Judge Kyle Duncan's
appearance

A Stanford student told Fox News that administrators should take action
after he was mortified by the behavior of students and the school's
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) dean, whose objections led a Trump-
appointed federal judge to ditch his speaking engagement.

Stanford DEI Associate Dean Tirien Steinbach joined students by claiming
that Judge Kyle Duncan, based out of the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, was
causing "harm" by his rulings.

Students could be heard yelling that Duncan's "racism is showing," and the
jurist ultimately was ushered out by federal marshals before being able to
offer his remarks.

"I look out, and I say I'm glad this is going on here," Steinbach was
heard saying on video while claiming that the Stanford administration
still believes in free speech.

Duncan had been invited by the Stanford branch of the Federalist Society,
which former President Donald Trump conferred with throughout his tenure
in nominating judges to the federal bench.

MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS LAUNCH PROTESTS AFTER SCHOOL CUTS MAJORS
LIKE MATH, ENGLISH, RELIGIOUS STUDIES

Josiah Joner, a student who had joined others in writing up his objection
to the chaotic scene for the Stanford Review, told "The Story" that it was
"emblematic of what's going on throughout the country."

"One of the biggest issues of this is that this wasn't just coming from
students. We expect conservative and liberal students to do, you know,
crazy stuff that's going to go against policies."

"There need to be administrators and officials of the university who are
there to be able to reaffirm the commitment to free speech and let these
people speak and be able to share their opinions — because that's the
principle that not only this country was built on, but … Stanford's
policies," Joner said.

He cited a written apology to Duncan from Stanford President Marc Tessier-
Lavigne and Law School Dean Jenny Martinez, adding that other "concrete
steps" must be taken to ensure freedom of speech and fair treatment of
invited speakers.

Joner said Steinbach acted in a way "unbefitting" of a law school
administrator — and should either pledge to commit to changing her
behavior or Tessier-Lavigne and others in leadership should take action to
prevent incidents overall.

Such scenes, he said, do "not have a place here at Stanford," adding that
action should also be taken to advise students their behavior was
unacceptable.

"These are supposed to be these future lawyers and Supreme Court justices,
and they're not standing up to those principles," he said.

In response to his premature departure, Duncan told the Washington Free
Beacon that he feels bad for the students rather than himself.

"Don’t feel sorry for me," he told the outlet. "I’m a life-tenured federal
judge. What outrages me is that these kids are being treated like dog----
by fellow students and administrators."

<https://www.foxnews.com/media/diversity-dean-heckles-trump-judge-out-
speech-stanford-law-student-calls-admin-take-action>

[Just kill them]

Kill the dean and the students. Kill them and their entire families.
The rot started with their parents. Kill the parents too.

Fifth Circuit Court Judge Kyle Duncan was heckled by students while
speaking at a Federalist Society event at Stanford University

Things quickly went south during a speech by federal Judge Kyle Duncan to
law students at Stanford University this week when the associate dean of
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) slammed him to his face after
hecklers interrupted his presentation.

Duncan, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, started
getting heckled by student protestors who made it impossible for him to
continue his speech.

According to video footage from the Thursday event, Dean Tirien Steinbach
did nothing to stop the heckling and instead launched a minutes-long
emotional speech during his presentation accusing him of causing "harm"
through his work on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and
suggesting the school needed to reconsider its policies on free speech.

"I had to write something down because I am so uncomfortable up here. And
I don't say that for sympathy, I just say that I am deeply, deeply
uncomfortable," Steinbach said, standing just feet from Duncan in the
lecture hall. "I'm uncomfortable because this event is tearing at the
fabric of this community that I care about, and I'm here to support."

"I have to ask myself … is the juice worth the squeeze? Is this worth it?"
she said at the event hosted by the Stanford Federalist Society.

THESE TOP COLLEGES SCAM YOU AND YOUR KIDS AS WOKE INSANITY SOARS

Duncan, appearing frustrated, suggested the event was a "setup" before
Steinbach interrupted him and continued.

"It isn't a setup. For many people in this law school who work here, who
study here and live here, your advocacy, your opinions from the bench,
land as absolute disenfranchisement of their rights," Steinbach said.

Duncan attempted to speak again, but the room erupted with jeers and
Steinbach stopped him, saying, "Please let me finish."

"It's uncomfortable to say this to you as a person. It's uncomfortable to
say that for many people here, your work has caused harm … and I know that
must be uncomfortable to hear. It must be," she said. "I'm also
uncomfortable because many of the people in the room here I have come to
care for."

Steinbach, who previously served as the chief program officer at the ACLU
of Northern California, went on to describe how her job as associate DEI
dean was to create "a space of belonging for all people in this
institution," despite not stopping some of the students' continued
aggression towards Duncan.

She told Duncan that she "wholeheartedly" welcomed him because she
believed in the necessity of free speech, but also went on to suggest his
speech was "abhorrent," "harmful," and "literally denies the humanity of
people."

She added that she didn't want to censor Duncan and that she found the
university's policy of free speech "worthy of defending even at this
time." She then, however, asked again if Duncan's speech was worth it.

"And, again, I ask is the juice worth the squeeze? Is this worth the pain
that this causes and the division that this causes?" she asked. "You have
something so incredibly important to say about Twitter and guns and COVID,
then that is worth this impact and the division … When I say is the juice
worth the squeeze, that's what I'm asking. Is this worth it?"

CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY'S STUDENTS' CAREERS TAKE A HIT AFTER DISTRICT
‘PUNISHED’ THEM FOR THEIR BELIEFS: ADMIN

Steinbach went on to say she would stay for Duncan's presentation, and to
hear his perspective, but that she understood that students who felt the
harm by his views was "so great" that the university "might need to
reconsider" its free speech policy.

"Luckily they're in a school where they can learn the advocacy skills to
advocate for those changes," she said.

She then thanked the protestors for "protecting the free speech that we
value here." Before giving those who chose not to stay to listen to Duncan
an opportunity to leave.

"I look out, and I don't ask what is going on here. I look out, and I say
I'm glad this is going on here," she added before turning the event back
over to Duncan as a throng of students walked out of the room.

Fox News Digital reached out to Stanford University for comment but did
not immediately receive a response.

<https://www.foxnews.com/politics/stanford-dei-dean-slams-federal-judge-
face-campus-event-free-speech-worth-it>

[Just kill them]

Shoot Tirien Steinbach in the head and then all the students who
protested. Shoot their parents too.

The Washington Free Beacon schooled law students on freedom of the press

Last week, students at Stanford Law disrupted a Federalist Society event
that featured U.S. Circuit Court Judge Kyle Duncan. Duncan was prevented
from speaking by unruly protesters and berated by the school's associate
dean of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Now, some of the protest leaders, many of whom shared the names and
pictures of Federalist Society members online and in posters, are unhappy
because the Washington Free Beacon published their names.

"NEW: The same students who plastered the names and faces of the Stanford
Federalist Society all over the school are now demanding anonymity from
the Free Beacon. They say we've violated their right to privacy by
identifying them. You can't make it up," Aaron Sibarium, a journalist for
the Washington Free Beacon, tweeted Friday.

NEW AUDIO OFFERS INSIGHT INTO STANFORD STUDENTS' WILD DISRUPTION OF
FEDERAL JUDGE: ‘YOU DON’T RESPECT US!'

"On Sunday, I identified board members of the Stanford National Lawyers
Guild--one of the groups responsible for the posters--who in a public
statement described the protest as 'Stanford Law School at its best.' A
few hours later, the board demanded I redact their names," Sibarium
reported.

Sibarium said that Lily Bou, a board member of the Stanford National
Lawyers Guild, sent an email demanding the Free Beacon remove her name and
those of other students from their reporting. "Listing our names serves no
purpose other than to invite abuse and harassment," she wrote.

"I wonder what purpose the posters of the fedsoc board served," Sibarium
wrote.

"You do not have our permission to reference or quote any portion of this
email in a future piece," she added.

"Needless to say, that's not how the First Amendment works," Sibarium
commented.

NEW VIDEO SHOWS STANFORD PROTESTERS HECKLING FEDERAL JUDGE AS DEI DEAN
APPEARS TO SMIRK

He went on, "We've gotten similar complaints about publishing
images—pulled from social media—of Stanford Law School dean Jenny
Martinez's classroom, which protesters covered end to end in flyers after
she issued an apology to Judge Duncan."

"We received a note from Mary Cate Hickman demanding that we ‘anonymize
the face of the student in the red hoodie’ because 'California is a two-
party consent state, and you have no right to publish this student's
identity/likeness/face without consent,'" he tweeted.

The reporter noted that two-party consent only applies to surreptitious
audio recordings and that there is no expectation of privacy during a
public protest at a public law school event where participants freely post
video and images. He also pointed out that the protest has been covered on
national television and publications, further eroding any expectation of
privacy.

"What's eminently clear from the drama unfolding in Palo Alto is that
while Stanford law students may be the vanguard of an anti-constitutional
revolution, they don't know much about the law. Where Stanford has failed
to educate them in the limits of privacy and the rights of a free press,
we will endeavor to fill the void with our continuing coverage of this
ugly affair."

Free speech is under attack on college campuses across America. At UC
Davis on Tuesday, conservative commentator Charlie Kirk's speech was
disrupted by protesters who smashed windows and clashed with police.

According to one survey, less than half Republican college students feel
safe expressing their political views on campus. Many students fear
retribution in personal and professional settings for sharing their
conservative beliefs.

<https://www.foxnews.com/media/stanford-law-protesters-demand-names-
redacted-news-reports-first-amendment-works>

[Stop The Gay Poison]

As a real capitalist, I believe the government needs to step in

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, N.C. — A North Carolina bill restricting how teachers
talk about race and gender in schools passed the state House and now heads
to the state Senate.

The bill would ban teachers from compelling students to agree to things
like "the United States was created by men whose purpose was to oppress
women or Black people" and that "a male is inherently sexist because of
his gender."

House Bill 187, sponsored by Gaston county Representative John Torbett,
mirrors a bill vetoed two years ago by Gov. Roy Cooper.

"House Bill 187 demonstrates the General Assembly intent that students,
teachers, administrators, and other school employees recognize the
equality and rights of all persons," Torbett said.

For the latest breaking news, weather and traffic alerts, download the
WCNC Charlotte mobile app.

There are no penalties listed in the bill, which its critics point out,
and opposing lawmakers say it would stop the open discussion at schools
about facts in American history.

Under HB187, teachers would have to walk a tight line on how they discuss
13 concepts related to race and gender. Under the bill, public schools
can't promote:

One race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.
An individual, solely by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently
racist, sexist, or oppressive.
An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment
solely or partly because of his or her race or sex.
An individual's moral character is necessarily determined by his or her
race or sex.
An individual, solely by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears
responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the
same race or sex.
Any individual, solely by virtue of his or her race or sex, should feel
discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress.
A meritocracy is inherently racist or sexist.
The United States was created by members of a particular race or sex for
the purpose of oppressing members of another race or sex.
The United States government should be violently overthrown.
Particular character traits, values, moral or ethical codes, privileges,
or beliefs should be ascribed to a race or sex or to an individual because
of the individual's race or sex.
The rule of law does not exist, but instead is a series of power
relationships and struggles among racial or other groups.
All Americans are not created equal and are not endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness.
Governments should deny to any person within the government's jurisdiction
the equal protection of the law.
"House Bill 187 is destructive to our school learning environment, it is a
distraction from the real issues that our public schools face and the
issues that families with school-aged children need to be addressed," Rep.
Julie von Haefen, a Democrat from Wake County, said.

Democrats have called the bill an attempt to align North Carolina with
legislation coming out of Florida by Republicans fighting against so-
called critical race theory (CRT) being taught in schools.

The bill does not mention CRT by name.

"This great education state must have an educational system that unites
and teaches our children, not divide and indoctrinate," Torbett said about
the bill.

You can stream WCNC Charlotte on Roku and Amazon Fire TV, just download
the free app.

The bill would also ban teachers from persuading students someone’s race
or gender makes them responsible for past acts like slavery or denying
women the right to vote.

"There is doubt about whether today's teachers can have the same
discussion about women's struggle for equal rights, the right to vote and
the reasons why women are underrepresented in politics and in other
fields," Von Haefen said.

Torbett said the bill wouldn’t change what parts of history can be taught
in schools.

"It prevents discriminatory concepts from being taught as fact or endorsed
in North Carolina school districts," Torbett said.

The bill also has a line that prevents students from feeling discomfort,
guilt, or anguish because of their race or gender while discussing
subjects in school

Representative Kelly Alexander, a Democrat from Mecklenburg county, said
history is uncomfortable.

"When you found out that in the middle passage, where about 12 million
Africans were taken from Africa, about two and a half million of them
would rather have died than to arrive in the Caribbean or to the eastern
shores of what has become the United States," Alexander said.

The bill passed 68-49 to move to the Senate.

The bill also would require schools to tell the NC Department of Public
Instruction when they have a speaker who comes to a school that talks
about the subjects outlined in the bill.

Contact Shamarria Morrison at ***@wcnc.com and follow her on
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

<https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/north-carolina-politics/nc-
bill-banning-students-feeling-discomfort-talking-race-gender/275-869c301c-
38f3-4012-a067-10c1517a0d6e>

[Sterlize the parents]

So what are the other main reasons?
People just don't like faggots?

Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday signed a bill into law
that bars transgender people from using school restrooms that do not align
with the sex listed on their birth certificate, the latest in a series of
GOP-led legislative efforts to restrict LGBTQ rights in schools.

The bill, which cleared the state’s legislature earlier this month, covers
restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms and shower rooms. It allows
superintendents, teachers and principals to be fined a minimum of $1,000
if they do not comply with the law, which applies to pre-K through 12th
grade in public and charter schools. It goes into effect in late summer,
Sanders’ office said.

The law requires “multiple occupancy restroom or changing areas,” be used
by those of the same sex “as identified on his or her original birth
certificate issued at or near the time of his or her birth,” the law says.

Accommodations must be provided for those who would be prohibited from
using the facilities under the law, according to the bill, but those
accommodations may not include “access to a restroom or changing area that
is designated for use by members of the opposite sex to an individual
while members of the opposite sex of the individual are present or may be
present.”

“The governor has said she will sign laws that focus on protecting and
educating our kids, not indoctrinating them and believes our schools are
no place for the radical left’s woke agenda,” Alexa Henning, a
spokesperson for Sanders, told CNN.

“Arkansas isn’t going to rewrite the rules of biology just to please a
handful of far-left advocates,” she added.

Republican state Rep. Mary Bentley, who sponsored the bill, said on
Facebook that the legislation is “how we restore our biblical values in
our Nation” and told CNN that it will “keep Arkansas children safe and
comfortable in their bathrooms.”

But Melanie Willingham-Jaggers, the executive director of GLSEN, an
organization that works to create non-discriminatory classroom
environments for LGBTQ students, told CNN that Arkansas politicians are
using “trans and nonbinary kids as political pawns. “

“These bathroom bans hurt students’ academic achievement – and the
educators held accountable for students’ success. Discriminatory policies
affect more than just grades: LGBTQ+ students who experience
discrimination, like being prohibited from using the restroom, report
higher levels of depression and lower self-esteem. Enforcing these bills
would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming for schools and
extraordinarily invasive toward transgender students,” Willingham-Jaggers
said.

And Eric Reece, the Human Rights Campaign’s Arkansas state director,
called the new law “another despicable effort by extremist politicians to
alienate kids who are just trying to navigate their childhoods.”

“Stopping kids from using bathrooms consistent with their gender identity
will not do anything to create jobs, lower costs, or make life easier on
Arkansas families,” Reece said. “This bill should have never reached the
governor’s desk, and she should be ashamed for signing it into law.”

Sanders, a former press secretary of President Donald Trump, has signed a
flurry of controversial bills since taking office in January, including
rolling back a number of child labor protections across the state,
restricting drag show performances in public and banning the use of the
term “Latinx” from official government document use.

Now, Arkansas joins a growing number of states that have approved
transgender bathroom bans in recent years. Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt of
Oklahoma signed a similar bill into law last year that has been challenged
by the American Civil Liberties Union in court.

This story has been updated with additional reaction.

<https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/22/politics/arkansas-transgender-bathroom-
ban-law/index.html>

[Scout]

"Arkansas isn't going to rewrite the rules of biology just to please a
handful of far-left advocates," she added.

Sounds reasonable to me. If they can't stand the though of going into a male
bathroom because they identify as female.. think how the females think when
a male walks in just because they have the delusion they are female.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:02:40 -0500, "Scout"

Post by Scout

"Arkansas isn't going to rewrite the rules of biology just to please a
handful of far-left advocates," she added.

Sounds reasonable to me. If they can't stand the though of going into a male
bathroom because they identify as female.. think how the females think when
a male walks in just because they have the delusion they are female.

"Oh no! They're threatening my very existence!"
-trannies everywhere

Too funny.