Discussion:
No Way CNN Tried to Sell This a Legitimate Defense of Claudine Gay's Plagiarism
(too old to reply)
useapen
2024-01-03 08:29:09 UTC
Permalink
There is no way this is an accurate statement from a reporter. Has the
liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one’s termination
are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
abysmal. There’s no need to split hairs here—and doing so makes you look
like an idiot.

CNN’s Matt Egan attempted to explain how now-former Harvard President
Claudine Gay wasn’t accused of stealing anyone’s ideas. She just copied
other people’s work and passed them off as her own without attribution.
Egan, that’s plagiarism.

Steve Guest
@SteveGuest
·
Follow
Bonkers explanation from CNN reporter Matt Egan on the Harvard plagiarism
scandal:

"We should note that Claudine Gay has not been accused of stealing
anyone's ideas in any of her writings. She has been accused of sort of
more like copying other peoples writings without… Show more

Is this how the media is going to explain homicides now: ‘The man wasn’t
accused of murder, just shooting someone so many times that the victim
died as a result.’

What a clown show.

Spencer wrote that Gay’s time at Harvard is over after multiple
accusations of plagiarism were lobbed against the beleaguered college
president, who should have resigned after her atrocious remarks about
antisemitism last December. Gay refused to condemn calls for genocide
against Jews, saying such actions were judged on a case-by-case basis.
While Gay isn’t resigning over that, her being exposed as an academic
fraud is certainly more damning.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/02/no-way-cnn-tried-to-
make-this-a-legitimate-defense-for-claudine-gays-plagiarism-
n2633096?utm_medium=widget&utm_source=slider
Marvin White
2024-01-03 16:20:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by useapen
There is no way this is an accurate statement from a reporter. Has the
liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one's termination
are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
abysmal. There's no need to split hairs here-and doing so makes you look
like an idiot.
Fox News just hired her to replace Hannity.

Loading...